返回资讯中心
外部精选
芯片&算力
#评测#基础设施#AI#Policy#Hugging Face#openai

"An AI did it" is no defense, says nonprofit suing OpenAI over Hugging Face hack

OpenAI makes others suffer "the harms of its unsafe decision-making," nonprofit says.

Ars Technica Jon Brodkin 2026/9/30 · 26 天前3 分钟阅读

以下正文同步自 Ars Technica,版权归原站所有,已转换为易读排版。

OpenAI's hack of Hugging Face in July 2026 has spurred a lawsuit demanding that the company stop accessing third-party computer systems and halt AI development practices that can harm the public. The lawsuit was filed by Legal Advocates for Safe Science & Technology (LASST), which said yesterday that the hack in which OpenAI "agents stole credentials, uploaded malicious files, and gained control over key parts of Hugging Face’s internal systems... is unquestionably illegal under California law." California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA) prohibits unauthorized access into computer systems, "and it doesn’t matter that a swarm of AI agents carried out this cyberattack. California law makes it clear that it is not a defense 'that the artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm,'" the group said. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco County Superior Court, said OpenAI also violated California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL). "OpenAI’s insistence on externalizing the harms of its unsafe decision-making is a fundamentally unfair business practice," the complaint said, adding that "such risk-taking for private gain at substantial public expense is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, and substantially injurious conduct." Read full article Comments

正文由 探How 从来源站点 RSS 同步,内容未经改写;遇到排版缺失或需要图片、视频时请以原文为准。

打开原文
去社区讨论 →