返回资讯中心
外部精选
软件工程
#开发者实时流

How bad is AI hurting recruitment, from both sides?

Hi Folks, Having been on the applicant side of hiring late, I've notice a lot of similar posts from people in the same situation (frequency illusion ?), due to the volume of applications they are unsure their CV is revi…

Hacker News 最新remarker2026/10/26 · 今天4 分钟阅读

以下正文同步自 Hacker News 最新,版权归原站所有,已转换为易读排版。

Hi Folks, Having been on the applicant side of hiring late, I've notice a lot of similar posts from people in the same situation (frequency illusion ?), due to the volume of applications they are unsure their CV is reviewed by human eyes.Separately, I've started reaching out to hiring managers, recruiters, agencies etc to get their input. There has been a common thread in their response, AI is used to review and "grade" submissions but its not uncommon for lower graded submissions to actually get the job over higher graded submissions.A few are using off the shelf software, others have created their own harness. We are seemingly in the world of applicants using AI to help apply, and AI grading the submissions. With Pandora's box opened, it's difficult to see AI ever being completely removed from the process, but it feels like a vicious cycle.(Job Market is tough -> People using AI to apply (sometimes auto apply) to jobs with targeted, enhanced or fabricated CVs -> Job openings receiving increased and overwhelming number of applications -> using AI to help filter and reduce the noise -> repeat).For people hiring, are you seeing the same? Do CV's carry the same weight as they use to and are screen calls now a necessary requirement? For people applying, how often are getting feedback & are far are you tailoring your CV? Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50244521 Points: 1

Comments: 0

正文由 探How 从来源站点 RSS 同步,内容未经改写;遇到排版缺失或需要图片、视频时请以原文为准。

打开原文
去社区讨论 →