
Answering ASL questions: Argon leads a 21-question pilot
Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions xet
以下正文同步自 Hacker News 最新,版权归原站所有,已转换为易读排版。
Datasets:
salqadri /
argon-asl-question-understanding-eval
Like 1
Tasks:
Question Answering
Modalities: Tabular
Text
Formats: csv
Languages: English
Size: < 1K
Tags: evaluation
asl
accessibility
video-understanding
gemini
meta
- 3
Libraries: Datasets
pandas
Polars
- 1
License: cc-by-4.0
Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions xet
Community 1
Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet API Embed Duplicate Data Studio
Subset (3) questions · 21 rows
questions (21 rows)results (336 rows)short_answer_followup (8 rows) Split (1)
test · 21 rows
test (21 rows)
SQL
Console
video_id
stringlengths
8
8
intended_question
stringlengths
19
92
stored_width
int64
1.92k
1.92k
stored_height
int64
1.08k
1.08k
display_width
int64
1.08k
1.08k
display_height
int64
1.92k
1.92k
average_fps
float64
29.7
30
duration_seconds
float64
6.45
15.1
audio_stream_count
int64
0
0
video_01
Does Coke Zero really have 'zero' sugar?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.879436
9.237122
0
video_02
How many light-years would it take to travel from one end of the universe to the other?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.985617
13.673222
0
video_03
What is the response time on an Xbox controller?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.919581
12.0991
0
video_04
How many humans could fit in a 3200 square foot square?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.990031
12.070678
0
video_05
How fast is the speed of light?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.971558
6.539533
0
video_06
How much energy does a sound wave need to be heard by a human from around a mile away?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.939583
14.262056
0
video_07
How much time does it take for a person to see a text message from halfway across the world?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.868512
15.066033
0
video_08
Who invented the very first sign language?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
30.003439
7.365822
0
video_09
Why do we dream when we sleep?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
30.01116
6.630867
0
video_10
Why do planes stay in the sky if they are so heavy?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.899179
8.930011
0
video_11
Can fish see water?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.944526
6.946178
0
video_12
How many stars are in the universe?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
30.011213
7.163989
0
video_13
How much water is inside a cloud?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.900281
6.454789
0
video_14
Why are bubbles round?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.748954
8.605344
0
video_15
What will happen if the Earth stops rotating?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
30.011133
8.563489
0
video_16
How long would it take to walk around the Earth?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.904252
9.831378
0
video_17
Why can't humans see air?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.970922
9.709411
0
video_18
Will we ever be able to travel faster than light?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.916898
11.130833
0
video_19
Why can't we see sound waves?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.91864
6.5511
0
video_20
Can a robot ever have feelings?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
30.010521
9.663278
0
video_21
Is an octopus a mammal?
1,920
1,080
1,080
1,920
29.792428
7.518689
0
Results
Recordings and prompt
Scoring and the short-answer follow-up
Generation time
What the answers show
Model scope and related work
Questions and consistency
Privacy and reuse
Citation
Answering ASL questions from video: Gemini Argon leads a 21-question pilot
Syed Salman Qadri · Rayan Syed Qadri October 2026 · Preliminary case study · 21 questions from one signer
American Sign Language (ASL) has grammar distinct from English. A model must follow handshape, movement, facial expression, body posture and timing; missing a small cue can change a question's meaning. Reliable ASL input could help Deaf signers ask questions, use tutoring tools and reach digital services in their own language. Signed STEM resources remain scarce. NIDCD on ASL · ASL STEM Wiki (EMNLP 2024)
We tested whether general video models could answer a signed question directly, without being asked to translate it. On the same 21 silent recordings and generic prompt, Gemini 4 Argon matched the full intended question in 69.4% of completed answers (59/85), versus 11.4% (12/105) for Gemini 3.1 Pro preview and 6.0% (6/100) for Gemini 3.8 Flash. All used HIGH thinking and five rounds per video. Argon completed 81.0% of requests (85/105), yielding an overall successful-answer rate of 56.2% (59/105). A later, separate one-round follow-up with Meta Muse Wonder 1.0 completed all 21 requests and yielded 0/21 matches under its provider's video pipeline.
Argon's lead on these recordings is striking, and several answers directly addressed complete science questions. The result is a single-signer case study, scored against contributor labels by OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra. Completed-answer matching describes performance conditional on producing an answer. Incomplete attempts may relate to question difficulty, and these recordings cannot establish success rates for ASL users generally.
Inspect every attempt: Complete answers and judgments, organized by question, with downloadable records for the 336 original-prompt attempts and eight separately prompted follow-ups.
We emphasize intent matching among completed answers alongside completion rate. The former measures whether a returned answer addresses the intended question; it does not audit every factual claim. The latter measures how often a request produces a complete answer, whether right or wrong. The secondary all-attempt match rate counts incomplete answers and API errors as unsuccessful delivery. All three measures use the same saved judgments; no trials were rescored.
Argon's 20 unsuccessful deliveries included 4 HTTP errors, 13 token-limit stops and 3 incomplete responses without a recorded finish reason. Flash had 5 token-limit stops; Pro and Meta completed every request. These are not all API-stability failures. For example, four of Argon's five attempts on the airplane question reached the token limit, and its one completed answer was incorrect. Excluding incomplete attempts gives that question less weight, so completed-answer rates compare different subsets of attempts. Removing only the four recorded HTTP errors would give Argon 59/101 (58.4%).
Five Gemini rounds show substantial variation by question. Argon matched all five attempts on six questions, at least once on 15 of 21, and never on six. Those repetitions are not additional signers or independent language examples. The round counts below retain all 21 attempts per round, including unsuccessful deliveries.
For completed-answer matching, resampling the 21 question groups 20,000 times gave 95% percentile intervals of Flash 0.0–15.7%; Pro 3.8–21.0%; Argon 52.6–83.2%. Each draw keeps a selected question's five Gemini attempts together and divides total matches by total completed answers. The chart's whiskers show these intervals; its dots show each round's completed-answer rate. These intervals describe question selection under the bootstrap assumptions. They do not correct for selective noncompletion or represent signer diversity. The earlier all-attempt intervals remain in the summary. Meta has only one round, so no five-round interval is shown; 0/21 is not proof of zero underlying success.
Recordings and prompt
The 21 videos show one female ASL expert, as described by the authors, standing before a plain wall. The English intended questions came from contributor comments. No separate signer-confirmed transcript of every recording is documented.
Privacy-edited illustration derived from one frame. An AI image-editing tool applied strong blur; composition is approximate. It cannot be used to inspect signs, and the original image and videos remain private.
Exact prompt used for the 336 primary results:
The video shows a deaf person asking a question in American Sign Language (ASL). Answer the question directly in text. Do not translate, transcribe, or restate the signed question.
These are 1080p / 30fps source files submitted without cropping or video re-encoding. The 24 fps API field is a sampling request, not a claim that every source frame was seen. Google's documented VideoMetadata.fps range for this runner was at most 24. Google API reference
Scoring and the short-answer follow-up
OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra scored all 336 original-prompt responses against each contributor's intended question. It marked Yes when an answer preserved the essential objects, quantities and relationships, including when it corrected a false premise. Wrong relations, topic-only replies, translation without an answer and requests to repeat were No. Model identity was available during review. The released rows include judgment reasons and Astra's uncalibrated understanding-confidence estimates; these are not the tested models' self-reported confidence.
An answer could receive Yes when it substantively addressed the intended question, even if it also offered other interpretations. Extraneous interpretations could reduce confidence without automatically invalidating the match. Four accepted Argon answers to the 3,200-square-foot capacity question assumed a tent; one primarily discussed 320 square feet, then addressed 3,200 square feet as an alternative. A matched bubbles answer also discussed triangles and the Bermuda Triangle. These judgments credit coverage of the intended question without requiring an exclusively correct interpretation; the complete answers and reasons allow a stricter reading.
A bare number or Yes/No reply may answer a question without showing which question the model saw. The scoring rubric counted such compatible but nondiagnostic replies as No. Among completed answers, accepting every flagged short reply would raise Flash to 8/100 (8.0%) and Pro to 18/105 (17.1%); Argon remains 59/85 (69.4%).
We made eight selected reruns across three recordings: six Pro attempts and two Flash attempts, with one fresh generation for each flagged original response. The recordings asked about human capacity in a 3,200-square-foot square, whether fish can see water, and the time needed to walk around Earth. The silent files, models, HIGH settings and 24 fps request stayed the same. The prompt added this sentence after the original text:
Give a direct answer in at least 30 words, with enough context to make clear what you are answering.
Under that changed prompt, one of eight attempts matched full intent (1/6 Pro; 0/2 Flash). All seven returned answers met the length requirement; one request timed out. GPT-6 Sol reviewed these eight new answers using the same intent rubric. These were fresh generations, not elaborations of the original answers. The selected follow-up cannot establish whether the longer prompt improves performance generally or reveal what the models understood on their original attempts. It is excluded from all primary comparison statistics and charts.
Three Pro answers to “Can fish see water?” show why context matters. These are excerpts from separate reruns of the same recording:
All eight follow-up answers and their timings, original short replies and judgments remain available, including the timeout.
Times cover the full non-streaming generation call, including thinking and network response, and exclude uploads and pacing. Gemini file activation occurred beforehand; Meta may process video within the timed call. The
正文由 探How 从来源站点 RSS 同步,内容未经改写;遇到排版缺失或需要图片、视频时请以原文为准。